Pygmalion and Galatea: Plot Summary
Pygmalion, a king of Cyprus, had a problem with women. According to Ovid in "Metamorphoses," he was a misogynist. So, he sculpted a perfect woman out of ivory. Pygmalion wanted nothing to do with the real ladies of his kingdom, thanks to their supposed imperfections. Instead, he carved an ivory statue so flawless it could make even the gods swoon.
The statue was later named Galatea, meaning "she who is milky white" in ancient Greek. Pygmalion didn't just admire his creation from a distance. He adored her, brought gifts, dressed her up, and whispered sweet nothings to her.
When Aphrodite's festival came around, Pygmalion made offerings to the goddess of love, hoping she'd bring his statue to life. Aphrodite, ever the romantic, decided to intervene. She breathed life into the statue, and Galatea became a living woman.
Pygmalion's reaction? He kissed her, and for the first time, the statue kissed back. They got married and even had a daughter named Paphos, after whom the city in Cyprus was named.
The myth has been reinterpreted to reflect on art, love, and the artist's obsession with perfection. George Bernard Shaw's "Pygmalion," for example, flips the script by having the artist, Professor Higgins, turn a real woman into a "statue" of high society. Eliza Doolittle, unlike Galatea, rejects being merely an artistic creation and leaves Higgins.
Pygmalion's story taps into deeper themes about how art and beauty intersect with love, desire, and even misogyny. It makes you wonder—what are we sculpting in our own lives, and what happens when those creations come alive?
Analysis of Pygmalion's Character and Misogyny
Let's dive into the character of Pygmalion and his issues with women.
Pygmalion's disdain for women wasn't born out of thin air. He had a deep-seated grudge against women, which led him to swear off the entire gender. In his eyes, the women of Cyprus were morally flawed and unworthy of his love. So, he creates his ideal woman out of ivory.
Pygmalion's ivory masterpiece, Galatea, wasn't just a sculpture. She was his fantasy brought to life. In Pygmalion's world, real women were too real, with all their human imperfections. He preferred an idealized version of a woman, one who was perfect in every way and, conveniently, couldn't talk back.
When Pygmalion's disdain for real women sends him into his workshop, it's not just about creating beauty. It's about control. His ideal statue is flawless, obedient, and utterly silent—everything he believed real women were not. It's like the ultimate "Build-A-Bride" workshop, minus the wedding registry.
Pygmalion's creation is a reflection of his own narcissism. By sculpting Galatea, he's essentially creating a female version of his ego's vision of perfection. The power dynamic is clear: He can adore her, dress her, whisper his desires to her, and she remains a passive recipient.
When Aphrodite breathes life into Galatea, it's as if she's saying, "Wake up and smell the reality check, Pygmalion!" She gives him what he desires, but with a twist. Galatea, now flesh and blood, symbolizes the unpredictability of life and love.
So, what's the takeaway here? Pygmalion's journey from misogyny to love underscores the flawed quest for perfection. Art can imitate life, but life is so much messier—and infinitely more interesting. The myth challenges us to embrace the imperfections, the messiness, and the humanity in our own creations.
Just remember, as much as Pygmalion tried to carve out his perfect woman, love—and life—have a funny way of chipping back at those ideals.
Cultural Impact and Modern Interpretations
The impact of the Pygmalion myth stretches across cultural history, infusing classic and modern literature, theater, opera, and visual arts with its ageless themes of creation, idealization, and transformation.
George Bernard Shaw's play "Pygmalion" borrowed the core myth but turned it on its head. Professor Henry Higgins, a linguistics expert, transforms Eliza Doolittle, a poor flower girl, into a refined lady. Unlike the original myth, Eliza doesn't remain passive; she gains independence and challenges Higgins' views. This play inspired "My Fair Lady," the beloved musical that added catchy songs to Shaw's sharp social commentary.
In opera, Jean-Philippe Rameau's "Pygmalion" focused on divine intervention and the miraculousness of the statue coming to life. Georg Anton Benda's version leaned more towards human reason and creativity. These interpretations showcase how Pygmalion's story remains versatile, adaptable to different philosophical and cultural climates.
Visual arts have a profound love affair with the Pygmalion myth. Jean-Leon Gerome's 19th-century paintings capture the poignant moment when Galatea awakens, her transformation symbolized in lush colors and detailed expressions. The visual arts revel in the tantalizing boundary between art and life.
Literature carries the myth with equal zeal. Even outside direct adaptations, the themes of transformation and creation permeate countless stories. Take "Pinocchio"—a wooden puppet brought to life, echoing the yearning for creation to become reality.
Cinema and contemporary media aren't left out either. The 1987 film "Mannequin" hilariously updates the myth for the 20th century with a department store mannequin coming to life. Even animated films like "Her" tap into Pygmalion's spirit, albeit in a digitally advanced world where AI simulations replace ivory statues.
In the world of dance, fresh interpretations continually breathe new life into the myth. Belgian choreographer Femke Gyselinck's dance interpretations strip away the focus on individuals, highlighting instead the fluidity of movement and collective creativity.
The Pygmalion myth's cultural resonance today is in its infinite adaptability. It's a myth that dances between the lines of art and life, reflecting our persistent yearning to mold and be molded, to create and be created. As long as there are dreams of transformation and idealization, Pygmalion's chisel will continue to carve its mark on our collective imagination.
Pygmalion's myth reminds us that while we may strive for perfection in our creations, it is the imperfections and unpredictability of life that truly enrich our experiences. As we reflect on this ancient story, let's embrace the messiness and humanity in both art and relationships.
- Ovid. Metamorphoses. Translated by A.D. Melville. Oxford University Press; 1986.
- Reinhold M. The Naming of Pygmalion's Animated Statue. Classical Journal. 1971;66(4):316-319.
- Billington M. My Fair Lady review – a masterful makeover for Lerner and Loewe's musical. The Guardian. July 4, 2018.
- Nelson M. Bluets. Wave Books; 2009.
Leave a Reply